CMRI’s Theological Position - The Chair of Peter Today is Vacant

$0.00

CMRI’s Theological Position: The Chair of Peter Today is Vacant

The Roman Catholic priests of the Religious Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen profess and adhere to the Catholic Faith as it has been consistently taught throughout the centuries since the time of Christ. With the death of Pope Pius XII and with the convocation of the Second Vatican Council, an unprecedented situation has befallen the Church, which threatens her very doctrines and worship. In order to provide for the preservation of the Catholic Faith and the traditional Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and Sacraments, the following statement has been drawn up for the purpose of clearly defining the actual position that these priests have taken.

I. VATICAN COUNCIL II: 

Convoked by John XXIII for the purpose of “updating” the Church, this council (held from 1962-65) decreed and implemented teachings previously condemned by the Infallible Teaching Magisterium of the Church. The Second Vatican Council’s heretical teachings were primarily in the areas of religious liberty and false ecumenism, and these were previously condemned by:

  1. Pope Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos (1832)

  2. Pope Pius IX in Quanta Cura and Syllabus of Errors (1864)

  3. Pope Leo XIII in Immortale Dei (1865) and Libertas Humana (1888)

  4. Pope Pius XI in Quas Primas (1925) and Mortalium Animos (1928)

  5. Pope Pius XII in Mystici Corporis (1943)

THEREFORE, the Second Vatican Council is to be rejected as a false council because it has erred in its teachings on faith and morals.

Add To Cart

CMRI’s Theological Position: The Chair of Peter Today is Vacant

The Roman Catholic priests of the Religious Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen profess and adhere to the Catholic Faith as it has been consistently taught throughout the centuries since the time of Christ. With the death of Pope Pius XII and with the convocation of the Second Vatican Council, an unprecedented situation has befallen the Church, which threatens her very doctrines and worship. In order to provide for the preservation of the Catholic Faith and the traditional Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and Sacraments, the following statement has been drawn up for the purpose of clearly defining the actual position that these priests have taken.

I. VATICAN COUNCIL II: 

Convoked by John XXIII for the purpose of “updating” the Church, this council (held from 1962-65) decreed and implemented teachings previously condemned by the Infallible Teaching Magisterium of the Church. The Second Vatican Council’s heretical teachings were primarily in the areas of religious liberty and false ecumenism, and these were previously condemned by:

  1. Pope Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos (1832)

  2. Pope Pius IX in Quanta Cura and Syllabus of Errors (1864)

  3. Pope Leo XIII in Immortale Dei (1865) and Libertas Humana (1888)

  4. Pope Pius XI in Quas Primas (1925) and Mortalium Animos (1928)

  5. Pope Pius XII in Mystici Corporis (1943)

THEREFORE, the Second Vatican Council is to be rejected as a false council because it has erred in its teachings on faith and morals.

CMRI’s Theological Position: The Chair of Peter Today is Vacant

The Roman Catholic priests of the Religious Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen profess and adhere to the Catholic Faith as it has been consistently taught throughout the centuries since the time of Christ. With the death of Pope Pius XII and with the convocation of the Second Vatican Council, an unprecedented situation has befallen the Church, which threatens her very doctrines and worship. In order to provide for the preservation of the Catholic Faith and the traditional Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and Sacraments, the following statement has been drawn up for the purpose of clearly defining the actual position that these priests have taken.

I. VATICAN COUNCIL II: 

Convoked by John XXIII for the purpose of “updating” the Church, this council (held from 1962-65) decreed and implemented teachings previously condemned by the Infallible Teaching Magisterium of the Church. The Second Vatican Council’s heretical teachings were primarily in the areas of religious liberty and false ecumenism, and these were previously condemned by:

  1. Pope Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos (1832)

  2. Pope Pius IX in Quanta Cura and Syllabus of Errors (1864)

  3. Pope Leo XIII in Immortale Dei (1865) and Libertas Humana (1888)

  4. Pope Pius XI in Quas Primas (1925) and Mortalium Animos (1928)

  5. Pope Pius XII in Mystici Corporis (1943)

THEREFORE, the Second Vatican Council is to be rejected as a false council because it has erred in its teachings on faith and morals.